Abstract
Basing on a study of ethnographic materials as well as on a critical analysis of two opposed conclusions (the first one admitting the freedom for man of pre-class society quite inconceivable in any other kind of society, while the second one denying any slightest possibility of manifesting human individuality) the author comes to the conclusion: it is society that has always been the real subject of history. It is impossible, however, to ignore the role of individuals in pre-class society along its development. Admitting but limited potentialities of society and man, due to the level of productive forces, the dependence of an individual on a collective body (such dependence has always existed, it is but its character that changes), it is impossible to ignore either certain independence of Man or his initiative, or the changing of traditions.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Edmundas Gendrolis,
Primitive Man: Traditional and Modern Interpretation
,
Problemos: Vol. 41 (1989): Problemos
-
Edmundas Gendrolis,
The Social Role of Religion in Feudal Society
,
Problemos: Vol. 1 (1968): Problemos
-
Edmundas Gendrolis,
The Place of Family in the Primitive Communal System
,
Problemos: Vol. 12 (1973): Problemos
-
Edmundas Gendrolis,
Cultural Relativism as a Theory of Values
,
Problemos: Vol. 24 (1979): Problemos
-
Edmundas Gendrolis,
Modern Social and Cultural Anthropology (Main Trends and Currents)
,
Problemos: Vol. 18 (1976): Problemos
-
Edmundas Gendrolis,
Totemism
,
Problemos: Vol. 34 (1986): Problemos
-
Edmundas Gendrolis,
Interaction of Nature and Culture
,
Problemos: Vol. 45 (1991): Problemos
-
Edmundas Gendrolis,
Originality of C. Levi-Strauss’ Social Anthropology
,
Problemos: Vol. 47 (1995): Problemos
-
Edmundas Gendrolis,
The Supernatural in Ideology of Ancestral Society
,
Problemos: Vol. 26 (1981): Problemos
-
Edmundas Gendrolis,
Modern Social and Cultural Anthropology (II)
,
Problemos: Vol. 19 (1977): Problemos