Reflections on Domestication: “Tame” and “Wild” in the Aesopic Animal Fables
Articles
Tua Korhonen
University of Helsinki
Published 2018-10-26
https://doi.org/10.15388/Litera.2017.3.11833
PDF

Keywords

fables, the Aesopic fables, domestication, domestic animals, wild animals

How to Cite

Korhonen T. (2018) “Reflections on Domestication: “Tame” and ‘Wild’ in the Aesopic Animal Fables”, Literatūra, 59(3), pp. 37-50. doi: 10.15388/Litera.2017.3.11833.

Abstract

[full article, abstract in English; abstract in Lithuanian]

The focus of this paper is a complex literary genre – the Aesopic fables – where animals are portrayed as agents, and the basic question rests on how “the animal’s point of view” and the “animality” of its depiction of animals are manifested. By using philosopher Clare Palmer’s conceptualizations, it is to be shown that although the Aesopic animal fables function as moral allegories, they may also explicate and reveal differing kinds of views on domestication and of such categories as “tame” and “wild” – especially the versions that are told by Babrius. Domestic animals can be depicted as a part of the household with different roles and different statuses, but domestication can also be represented as a form of slavery for animals in contrast to the human-free existence of the wild animals, and the reason for domestication is that humans have more or less cheated animals into working for them (as an aetiology of domestication).

PDF
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Please read the Copyright Notice in Journal Policy