F. NIETZSCHE IR G. DELEUZE: SĖSLUMO SIMPTOMATIKA IR NOMADIŠKO MĄSTYMO AKISTATOS
Philosophy of Humanities and Social Sciences
Arūnas Mickevičius
Published 2006-01-01
https://doi.org/10.15388/Problemos.2006..4056
arunas_mickevicius_62-83.pdf (Lithuanian)

How to Cite

Mickevičius, A. (2006) “F. NIETZSCHE IR G. DELEUZE: SĖSLUMO SIMPTOMATIKA IR NOMADIŠKO MĄSTYMO AKISTATOS”, Problemos, 69, pp. 62–83. doi:10.15388/Problemos.2006. 4056.

Abstract

Remiantis F. Nietzsche’s ir G. Deleuze’o tekstų analize, siekiama parodyti, kad pagal klasikinio mąstymo kanonus ypač problemišku dalyku tampa naujos minties pasirodymo galimybė. Klasikinis mąstymas traktuojamas kaip sėslios egzistencijos tipas ir jam priešinamas klajokliškas, nomadiškas mąstymas. Pasitelkiant Deleuze’s išskirtus atpažinimo ir susitikimo modelius, pirma, siekiama pagrįsti požiūrį, kad ir Nietzsche’s filosofiją galime vadinti nomadišku mąstymu ir atitinkančią susitikimo modelį ir antra, siekiama išryškinti naujybės specifiką ir jos steigties transcendentalines sąlygas.
Reikšminiai žodžiai: valia siekti galios, interpretacija, simptomatika, sėslusis mąstymas, nomadizmas, atpažinimo modelis, susitikimo modelis.

F. NIETZSCHE AND G. DELEUZE: THE SEDENTARY LIFE SYMPTOMATICS AND NOMADIC THINKING CONFRONTATIONS
Arūnas Mickevičius

Summary
The article deals with F. Nietzsche’s and G. Deleuze’s attitude to classical thought. Nietzsche’s theoretical constructs are based on the principle Wille zur Macht, where he emphatically praised active forces and accused all classical thinking of turning away from life and associating it with reactive, negative forces. Nietzsche’s philosophy denies the exceptionally unique true opinion of the world and offers, instead, a variety of interpretations, i. e. a perspectivist approach to the world. In describing architectural metaphors of classical thinking he shows that it is reactive, life-denying, that its assumed grandeur in fact hides the poverty of life. On the other hand, Nietzsche attempts to release the metaphoric power from the single axiom of Truth, to release creativity, to legitimize a perspective, interpretative view of the world, based on the mentioned “will-to-power” principle and related to assertive powers of active life. Also, there are analyzed two models of knowledge, recognition and encounter, proposed by G. Deleuze. The main aims of the article is to demonstrate first, that Nietzsche’s philosophy can be named as nomadic thinking which corresponds to the model of encounter and, second, reveal the transcendental conditions of innovation. 
Keywords: will to power, interpretation, symptomatics, sedentary life, nomadism, encounter model, recognition model.

arunas_mickevicius_62-83.pdf (Lithuanian)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.