Question order effects in sustainable behavior norm measurement: Gender differences
Articles
Mykolas Simas Poškus
Mykolas Romeris University Faculty of Social Technologies Institute of Psychology Ateities Str. 20, LT-08303 Vilnius, Lithuania Tel. + 370 5 271 4620
Raimonda Sadauskaitė
Klaidpėda University Faculty of Pedagogy Department of Psychology S. Nėries Str. 5, LT-92227 Klaipėda, Lithuania Tel. + 370 46 39 8600
Published 2015-07-01
https://doi.org/10.15388/Psichol.2015.51.8256
PDF

Keywords

order effects
sustainability norms
questionnaire design
gender differences

How to Cite

Poškus, M. S., & Sadauskaitė, R. (2015). Question order effects in sustainable behavior norm measurement: Gender differences. Psichologija, 51, 58-67. https://doi.org/10.15388/Psichol.2015.51.8256

Abstract

Sustainable behavior is an important and increasingly popular field of research, but the question order effects that may occur in descriptive and injunctive sustainable behavior norm measurements remain largely unexplored. Even less attention is drawn to gender differences that may be present in question order effects. In the present study, we have investigated the question order effects and their gender differences in measurements of descriptive and injunctive social norms directed at sustainable behavior. For the purposes of the study, three questionnaires were constructed, each questionnaire consisting of 16 items half of which were directed at injunctive and half at descriptive social norms. The questionnaires differed only in the order in which the items were presented. Engineering, art, and social science students from various Lithuanian universities participated in the study (N = 296). The participants were equally distributed by gender, their mean age was 20 years (SD = 1.5). Participants were asked to fill in the questionnaires during lectures, and each participant was randomly assigned to fill in one of three types of questionnaires. The results have shown that the evaluations of injunctive and descriptive social norms were sensitive to the question order. When priming participants with one type of social norm, the evaluation of the other type of social norm was affected. Presenting questionnaire items in random order did not cancel priming; rather, it made both types of social norms salient at the same time, and therefore norm measurements of this group did not differ from those that were obtained under priming. The further analysis indicated that the question order effects were present only in the female sample. We recommend presenting questionnaire items directed at descriptive and injunctive social norms in random order. When measuring just one type of social norm, we would recommend adding items directed at the other type of social norm as well, in order to obtain data that would be more comparable with other studies.

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)