Stephen Dixon's Novels: Autobiographicality as Transgression
Issues of literary narratives and contexts
Yuliia Honcharova
Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3302-1468
Victoriia Lipina
Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9089-5159
Published 2021-04-23
https://doi.org/10.15388/RESPECTUS.2020.39.44.79
PDF
HTML

Keywords

autobiographical trangression
Stephen Dixon
I.-texts
auto/bio/graphicality
a fiduciary subject

How to Cite

Honcharova Y. and Lipina V. (2021) “Stephen Dixon’s Novels: Autobiographicality as Transgression”, Respectus Philologicus, (39 (44), pp. 89–100. doi: 10.15388/RESPECTUS.2020.39.44.79.

Abstract

The idea advanced in the paper is to theorize the mechanisms of autobiographicality in Stephen Dixon’s novels that are viewed as a radical renewal of autobiographical narrative, where the modality of disappearance/return of the subject produces a new mode of life-writing. We propose the term “autobiographical transgression” to capture the essence of this renewal started by three representative figures – John Barth, Stephen Dixon, and Joseph Heller that can be reduced neither to autobiography as a genre, nor to “transgressive autobiography” as its generic variant. Dixon finds a new form for representing autos. He creates the character with the name-deixis I. that personifies a fiduciary subject, thus, suggesting a provocative restatement of postmodernist generic problems. In the novels I. and End of I. the autobiographical hero I. exists simultaneously as a metaphor of the author’s presence in the text, as the subjective author’s I and as a character in the novel − an objectified, semi-functional, distancing I. The transplanting of life experience manifests itself in a special kind of repersonalization and double coding of the traditional autobiographical subject.

PDF
HTML
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Please read the Copyright Notice in Journal Policy