Comparisons of Some Weighting Methods for Non-response Adjustment
Articles
Bernardo Jo˜ao Rota
Örebro University, Sweden; Eduardo Mondlane University, Mozambique
Thomas Laitila
Örebro University, Sweden; Statistics Sweden
Published 2015-12-20
https://doi.org/10.15388/LJS.2015.13882
PDF

Keywords

calibration
auxiliary variables
response probability
maximum likelihood

How to Cite

Rota B. J. and Laitila T. (2015) “Comparisons of Some Weighting Methods for Non-response Adjustment”, Lithuanian Journal of Statistics, 54(1), pp. 69-83. doi: 10.15388/LJS.2015.13882.

Abstract

Sample and population auxiliary information have been demonstrated to be useful and yield approximately equal resultsin large samples. Several functional forms of weights are suggested in the literature. This paper studies the properties of calibrationestimators when the functional form of response probability is assumed to be known. The focus is on the difference between populationand sample level auxiliary information, the latter being demonstrated to be more appropriate for estimating the coefficients in theresponse probability model. Results also suggest a two-step procedure, using sample information for model coefficient estimation inthe first step and calibration estimation of the study variable total in the second step.

PDF
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Please read the Copyright Notice in Journal Policy