Abstract
A limited liability company or joint stock company with its headquarters in Lithuania can be a taxpayer of Polish direct or indirect taxes. The Lithuanian company is authorized to be a party to the proceedings before the tax authorities of first or second instance. Since the Polish tax procedure is based on the subjective or objective criterion, there are no obstacles to the proceedings regarding the Lithuanian resident taking place. Note, however, that it must be represented before the authorities by an attorney who uses the Polish language. It is best if this person is a lawyer, legal adviser or tax adviser of Polish origin. If a limited liability company based in Lithuania has its branch in Poland, a person representing a branch may appear before the tax authority. Note, however, that all the repercussions on the course and outcome of the proceedings will affect the parent entity. The fact is that the branch of the company is present in the proceedings in the name and on behalf of the founding company. The lack of current regulations on deliveries in tax proceedings specifically relating to foreign taxpayers should be regarded as a de lege lata application. There is a possibility of delivering the letter by means of electronic communication. However, the taxpayer must already be familiar with complex rules relating to this method of delivery and meet its formal requirements. The need to extend the statutory definition of the taxpayer (located in the Tax Code) with a reference to entities located outside Poland was recognized as a de lege ferenda application. It is worth confirming, through legislative changes, the equality of rights and responsibilities of all taxpayers in the Polish tax procedure, regardless of their residence.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Vytautas Vaškelaitis,
Viktorija Martišiūtė,
Dividendai ir jų mokėjimas: teisinis vertinimas
,
Teisė: Vol. 76 (2010): Teisė
-
Armanas Abramavičius,
Andželika Vosyliūtė,
OVERT THEFT AND THE PECULIARITIES OF THE QUALIFICATION
,
Teisė: Vol. 105 (2017): Teisė
-
Paulius Veršekys,
Nusikalstamos veikos sudėties požymio samprata ir ją lemiantys veiksniai
,
Teisė: Vol. 82 (2012): Teisė
-
Neringa Glebovė,
Valstybės tarnybos samprata ir valstybės tarnautojo statuso ypatumai
,
Teisė: Vol. 76 (2010): Teisė
-
Светлана Вашкевич,
SPHERE OF LEGAL REGULATION: PROBLEMS OF DEFINITION AND CORRELATION WITH SUBJECT OF LEGAL REGULATION
,
Teisė: Vol. 105 (2017): Teisė
-
Gintautas Sakalauskas,
Pädophilie als eine Krankheit und als ein Anreiz für ein kriminelles Verhalten
,
Teisė: Vol. 111 (2019): Teisė
-
Aušra Dambrauskienė,
The Conception of the Ultima Ratio Principle
,
Teisė: Vol. 97 (2015): Teisė
-
Andželika Vosyliūtė,
Įsibrovimo į patalpą, saugyklą ar saugomą teritoriją kaip vagystę kvalifikuojančio požymio samprata teisės moksle ir teismų praktikoje
,
Teisė: Vol. 66 No. 1 (2008): Teisė
-
Vytautas Nekrošius,
Rimantas Simaitis,
Vigita Vėbraitė,
Aurimas Brazdeikis,
THE INFLUENCE OF PREPARATORY STAGE IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS ON HEARING A CASE WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME
,
Teisė: Vol. 98 (2016): Teisė
-
Tomas Bagdanskis,
The Termination of an Employment Contract Initiated by the Employer’s Will
,
Teisė: Vol. 118 (2021): Teisė