Evaluation of the Reliability of Electrocardiographic Criteria for Cardiac Hypertrophy Based on Echocardiographic Data
Research papers
Agnė Augustaitytė
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
Eglė Kalinauskienė
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
Published 2022-07-26
https://doi.org/10.15388/Amed.2021.29.1.12
PDF
HTML

Keywords

ECG criteria
left ventricular hypertrophy
transthoracic echocardiography

How to Cite

1.
Augustaitytė A, Kalinauskienė E. Evaluation of the Reliability of Electrocardiographic Criteria for Cardiac Hypertrophy Based on Echocardiographic Data. AML [Internet]. 2022 Jul. 26 [cited 2024 Apr. 24];29(1):91-9. Available from: https://www.journals.vu.lt/AML/article/view/25332

Abstract

 Background. Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) regardless of other risk factors may be associated with an increased risk of mortality from cardiovascular diseases. Therefore, timely diagnosis for LVH is important in order to avoid possible complications. One of the simplest and cheapest methods to diagnose LVH is electrocardiography (ECG). Although a number of ECG criteria for LVH is known, their reliability varies in many studies.
Aim. To evaluate the reliability of ECG criteria for LVH based on transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) data.
Methods. The study included all consecutive patients in Kaunas Clinical Hospital Department of Cardiology from December 2019 until March 2020 and from September until October 2020, after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The sensitivity and specificity of the ECG criteria for LVH were assessed based on TTE measurements performed during the same inpatient setting. The reliability of the ECG criteria for LVH was assessed using ROC curves. Reliability differences in gender, age and nutritional status groups were assessed using ANOVA statistical method.
Results. Data from 95 patients were analyzed (63.2% were women and 36.8% were men). The sensitivity, specificity and AUC of Sokolow–Lyon criterion were 9.38%, 85.71% and 0.44 (p = 0.034), R in aVL – 6.25%, 90.48% and 0.51 (p = 0.038), Cornell – 21.88%, 100 % and0.69 (p = 0.084), Cornell product – 31.25%, 95.24% and 0.72 (p = 0.070), Peguero–Lo Presti – 31.25%, 85.71% and 0.68 (p = 0.053), respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed among the individual gender, age and nutritional status groups.
Conclusions. Sokolow–Lyon and RaVL criteria were not statistically significantly reliable in LVH diagnosis compared to TTE, unlike the Cornell, Cornell product, and Peguero–Lo Presti criteria.

PDF
HTML

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>