Balto-Slavic and Indo-Iranian
Straipsniai
Frederik Kortlandt
Leiden University image/svg+xml
Publikuota 2026-01-28
https://doi.org/10.15388/Baltistica.51.2.2284
PDF

Kaip cituoti

Kortlandt, F. (vert.) (2026) „Balto-Slavic and Indo-Iranian“, Baltistica, 51(2), p. 355–364. doi:10.15388/Baltistica.51.2.2284.

Santrauka

The closest relatives of Balto-Slavic are Albanian and Indo-Iranian. Together with Armenian and Thracian, these are the satǝm languages, which together with Greek and Phrygian constitute the eastern part of Classic Indo-European.

The obvious common development in this area is the satǝm palatalization, which did not affect Greek and Phrygian. Indo-Iranian was separated from the other satǝm languages by the depalatalization of palatovelars before resonants in the latter.

Proto-Indo-European had a threefold distinction between fortis, glottalic lenis, and plain lenis obstruents, all of them voiceless, e.g. *t [t:], *d [ť], *dh [t]. In the Classic Indo-European languages (after their separation from Anatolian and Tocharian), the lenis obstruents became voiced [ʔd], [d], while the fortis remained voiceless [t]. This system was best preserved in Indo-Iranian, Balto-Slavic and Albanian.

Another development that seems to be dialectal Indo-European is the retraction of *s to *ṣ after *i, *u, *r, *k in Indo-Iranian, Balto-Slavic, Albanian and Armenian. However, this retraction cannot be dated and may have affected any part of the IndoEuropean dialects. This may also explain the Hittite reflex š of PIE *s.

The large majority of special correspondences between Balto-Slavic and IndoIranian are archaisms, not innovations. This is important because it implies that a comparison of Balto-Slavic with Indo-Iranian leads to a reconstruction of an early stage of Indo-European.

PDF
Kūrybinių bendrijų licencija

Šis kūrinys yra platinamas pagal Kūrybinių bendrijų Priskyrimas 4.0 tarptautinę licenciją.

Atsisiuntimai

Nėra atsisiuntimų.

Skaitomiausi šio autoriaus(ų) straipsniai

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 > >>