Abstract
The paper analyses the concept of definiteness and the semantics and formal expression of the category of definiteness. It also offers an overview of the concept of the category and its investigation in Lithuanian linguistics. Definiteness helps solve problems of the referent identification in the course of communication and is a universal semantic/pragmatic category. In languages with a grammatical expression of definiteness and formally marked by articles, the category of definiteness is grammatical. Articles mainly serve as a means of coordinating reference; however, eventually their usage might become wider and the number of functions might increase. As a result, they gradually seep into indefinite contexts. Since languages manifest a varied expression of definiteness, in contrastive studies only the semantic content of the category can serve as a tertium comparationis. It can be broadly defined in the following way: the semantics of definite description is characterised by its referent which is known to the addressee or can be easily and unambiguously identified and is the only one (unique and maximum) in a certain pragmatic set. The semantics of indefinite description is characterised by an addressee who/which is unable to identify the referent and in respect to uniqueness such description is neutral. The expression of definiteness in Lithuanian can hardly be treated as grammatical, with the pronominal morpheme of the definite form of adjectives being the only formal marker of definiteness. Previous research has been fairly scarce in identifying the contrast, distribution and functions of definite and indefinite forms in Lithuanian. For example, there has been no research done when the definite form is obligatory, when it is optional or when its usage is ungrammatical. Definiteness in Lithuanian is also expressed by demonstrative pronouns; and some of them, according to Albertas Rosinas, have become dysfunctional and presently perform the function of definite markers in spoken language. Definiteness also correlates with the functional sentence perspective and word order as well as the opposition between the nominative /accusative vs the genitive case. However, in Lithuanian to finally discriminate between the definite and the indefinite interpretation is only possible by referring to context.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Ona Laima Gudzinevičiūtė,
Džiuljeta Maskuliūnienė,
Lithuanian Language at School: Scientific Insights and Pedagogical Experience
,
Lietuvių kalba: 2023: Lietuvių kalba (Supplementum)
-
Agnė Kuliešienė,
Vilma Zubaitienė,
Preface
,
Lietuvių kalba: 2023: Lietuvių kalba (Supplementum)
-
Irena Smetonienė,
Marius Smetona,
Development of Stylistics and Rhetoric in Lithuania
,
Lietuvių kalba: 2023: Lietuvių kalba (Supplementum)
-
Bonifacas Stundžia,
Baltic Linguistics in Lithuania During a Century
,
Lietuvių kalba: 2023: Lietuvių kalba (Supplementum)
-
Dainius Žemaitis,
Audrius Valotka,
Legal Status of the State Language in Lithuania after the Restoration of Independence
,
Lietuvių kalba: 2023: Lietuvių kalba (Supplementum)
-
Giedrė Čepaitienė,
Lithuanian Language Curricula
,
Lietuvių kalba: 2023: Lietuvių kalba (Supplementum)
-
Aldonas Pupkis,
The Official Lithuanian Language in the Interwar Years
,
Lietuvių kalba: 2023: Lietuvių kalba (Supplementum)
-
Meilutė Ramonienė,
Development of Applied Linguistics
,
Lietuvių kalba: 2023: Lietuvių kalba (Supplementum)
-
Irena Smetonienė,
Editorial Board and Table of Contents
,
Lietuvių kalba: No. 17 (2022): Lietuvių kalba
-
Antanas Smetona,
Tradition and Development of Lithuanian Terminology
,
Lietuvių kalba: 2023: Lietuvių kalba (Supplementum)