Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for colon and rectal resection: a single-institution experience in 473 patients
Clinical Practice
Žygimantas Kuliešius
Audrius Dulskas
Justas Kuliavas
Giedrė Rudinskaitė
Narimantas E. Samalavičius
Published 2017-04-12
https://doi.org/10.15388/LietChirur.2017.10629
PDF

Keywords

laparoscopic colectomy
hand-assisted laparoscopy
colon cancer

How to Cite

1.
Kuliešius Žygimantas, Dulskas A, Kuliavas J, Rudinskaitė G, Samalavičius NE. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for colon and rectal resection: a single-institution experience in 473 patients. LS [Internet]. 2017Apr.12 [cited 2022Oct.7];16(2):114-9. Available from: https://www.journals.vu.lt/lietuvos-chirurgija/article/view/10629

Abstract

Background / Objective
Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) has been introduced into clinical practice for almost three decades. It combines the advantages of both laparoscopic (minimally invasive) and conventional open surgery. Despite all the published data, there are still scepticism in surgical community regarding this hybrid form of laparoscopic surgery and the role of HALS is still being defined. Our study aimed to review 10 year experience in treating patients at single centre with colonic and rectal pathology using HALS.

Methods
This study was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of 473 patients undergoing hand assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery for colon and rectal disease, mainly cancer, in a single tertiary care institution, National Cancer Institute, from January, 2006, to July, 2016. All consented patient with colonic and rectal pathology were included in the analysis.

Results
The patients’ mean age was 64.14 ± 9.75 years. Female and male ratio was similar 240 (50.73%) vs. 233 (49.27%). The mean length of postoperative hospital stay was 6.92, ranging from 2 to 34 days. Histological examination revealed mean lymph node harvest was 16.97 ± 12.10. Stage I, II, III cancer groups were similar accounting for 142 (30.02%), 139 (29.35%) and 153 (32.35%) cases respectively, stage IV – 36 (7.61%) and three cases of benign origin. Segmental colectomies were performed in 53.0% cases, 45.3% patients had rectal resections and “other” 1.7%. Surgical re-intervention was required for 10 patients (2.11%). Complication rate was 6.55%, and mortality documented in only 2 cases (0.42%).

Conclusion
HALS is safe and feasible technique, which maintains all the benefits of laparoscopic colectomy and can be performed for numerous indications, while affording the surgeon to carry out complex cases in a minimally invasive fashion.

PDF

Please read the Copyright Notice in Journal Policy

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>