Grounding on the applied qualitative research methods based on theories of humanism and social constructivism, employed semi-structured interview and simulation game “Gamlec”, the article presents an analysis of possibilities for fostering independence in residential social care institutions, emphasises a dimension of dignity and reveals how the interaction of staff, residents and relatives leads to support of independence in the institutional environment.
The analysis reveals that respectful communication, assurance of privacy, possibility to participate in the decision-making, acknowledgement of romantic relationships and a positive social climate maintain independence. Several negative factors, such as hyper-care, bullying, lack of privacy and insufficient preparation for palliative care, are pointed out.
The research represents a close connection between independence and dignity as well as supplements earlier studies with new insights on the significance of emotional climate, the role of relatives and organisational culture. The results are relevant to practice, enhancement of competencies of staff of care institutions and building of dignity-based care.
Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, T. (1999). Socialinis tikrovės konstravimas: žinojimo sociologijos traktatas [The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge]. Vilnius: Pradai.
Bimou, C., Harel, M., Laubarie-Mouret, C., Cardinaud, N., Charenton-Blavignac, M., Toumi, N., Trimouillas, J., Gayot, C., Boyer, S., Hebert, R., Dantoine, T., & Tchalla, A. (2021). Patterns and predictive factors of loss of the independence trajectory among community-dwelling older adults. BMC Geriatrics, 21(1), Article 142. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02063-7
Burr, V. (1995). An Introduction to Social Constructionism. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203133026
Caillaud, S., & Flick, U. (2017). Focus groups in triangulation contexts. In R. S. Barbour & D. L. Morgan (Eds.), A New Era in Focus Group Research (pp. 155–177). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58614-8_8
Clancy, A., Simonsen, N., Lind, J., Liveng, A., & Johannessen, A. (2021). The meaning of dignity for older adults: A meta-synthesis. Nursing Ethics, 28(6), 878–894. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733020928134
Dong, D., Cai, Q., Zhang, Q.-Z., Zhou, Z.-N., Dai, J.-N., Mu, T.-Y., Xu, J.-Y., & Shen, C.-Z. (2021). Dignity and its related factors among older adults in long-term care facilities: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 8(4), 394–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2021.08.003
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
Gečienė, J., Gudžinskienė, V. (2018). Socialinės globos įstaigų, teikiančių paslaugas senyvo amžiaus asmenims, darbuotojų požiūris į teikiamų paslaugų kokybę [Attitude of Staff of Social Care Institutions Providing Services to Older People towards the Quality of Provided Services]. Socialinė teorija, empirija, politika ir praktika, 17, 37–56. https://doi.org/10.15388/STEPP.2018.17.11930
Ghenţa, M., Matei, A., Mladen-Macovei, L., & Stănescu, S. (2022). Quality of life of older persons: The role and challenges of social services providers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(14), Article 8573. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148573
Goroff, N. (1981). Humanism and social work paradoxes, problems, and promises. The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.15453/0191-5096.1437
Groenvynck, L., De Boer, B., Beaulen, A., De Vries, E., Hamers, J. P. H., Van Achterberg, T., Van Rossum, E., Khemai, C., Meijers, J. M. M., & Verbeek, H. (2022). The paradoxes experienced by informal caregivers of people with dementia during the transition from home to a nursing home. Age and Ageing, 51(2), Article afab241. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afab241
Groenvynck, L., Khemai, C., De Boer, B., Beaulen, A., Hamers, J. P. H., Van Achterberg, T., Van Rossum, E., Meijers, J. M. M., & Verbeek, H. (2023). The perspectives of older people living with dementia regarding a possible move to a nursing home. Aging & Mental Health, 27(12), 2377–2385. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2023.2203693
Holmberg, B., Godskesen, T. (2022). Dignity in bodily care at the end of life in a nursing home: An ethnographic study. BMC Geriatrics, 22(1), Article 593. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03244-8
Van Hoof, J., Verbeek, H., Janssen, B. M., Eijkelenboom, A., Molony, S. L., Felix, E., Nieboer, K. A., Zwerts-Verhelst, E. L. M., Sijstermans, J. J. W. M., & Wouters, E. J. M. (2016). A three perspective study of the sense of home of nursing home residents: The views of residents, care professionals and relatives. BMC Geriatrics, 16(1), Article 169. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0344-9
Indarwati, R., Efendi, F., Fauziningtyas, R., Fauziah, A., & Sudarsiwi, N. P. (2023). Efforts to improve the safety culture of the elderly in nursing homes: A qualitative study. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, Volume 16, 393–400. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S399826
Kolbergytė, A., Indrašienė, V. (2012). Konsultuojamojo ugdymo kompetencijos taikymo galimybės socialinių darbuotojų rengime: teorinės prielaidos [Possibilities for Application of the Competence of Consulting Education in Training Social Workers: Theoretical Assumptions]. Socialinis darbas, 11(1), 73–84.
Lietuvos Respublikos socialinės apsaugos ir darbo ministerija. (2006). Dėl Socialinių paslaugų katalogo patvirtinimo [On the approval of the Catalogue of Social Services] (2006 m. balandžio 5 d. įsakymas Nr. A1-93, su vėlesniais pakeitimais). https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalAct/lt/TAD/TAIS.274453/asr
Lietuvos Respublikos socialinės apsaugos ir darbo ministerija. (2007). Dėl Socialinės globos normų aprašo patvirtinimo [On the approval of the description of social care standards] (2007 m. vasario 20 d. įsakymas Nr. A1-46, su 2025 m. gruodžio 11 d. pakeitimais). https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalAct/lt/TAD/TAIS.292682/asr
Lietuvos Respublikos Seimas. (2006). Lietuvos Respublikos socialinių paslaugų įstatymas [Law on Social Services of the Republic of Lithuania] (2006 m. sausio 19 d. Nr. X-493, su vėlesniais pakeitimais). https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalAct/lt/TAD/TAIS.270342
Lietuvos Respublikos Vyriausybės kanceliarija. (2022, vasario 3). Socialinės paslaugos senjorams ir jų šeimoms: kas priklauso ir kur kreiptis? [Social Services for Senior People and Their Families: What Is Due and Where to Address to?]. E. pilietis. https://epilietis.lrv.lt/lt/naujienos/socialines-paslaugos-senjorams-ir-ju-seimoms-kas-priklauso-ir-kur-kreiptis
Lukamskienė, V., Budėjienė, A. (٢٠١٣). Socialinės paslaugos vyresnio amžiaus asmenims: savipagalbos ir socialinės globos aspektai [Social Services for Older People: Aspects of Self-help and social Care]. Gerontologija, 14(4), 228–234.
Molenaar, E. A. L. M., Barten, J. A., Te Velde, S., Van Der Schoot, L., Bleijenberg, N., De Wit, N. J., & Veenhof, C. (2023). Functional independence in the community dwelling older people: A scoping review. Journal of Population Ageing, 16(1), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-020-09315-1
Naujanienė, R. (2008). Kliento problemų ypatumai gerontologinio socialinio darbo tyrimuose [Characteristics of Client’s Problems in Gerontological Social Work Research]. Socialinis darbas, 7(1), 36–39.
Orlova, U. L. & Gruževskis B. (2014). Savarankiškumas – socialinės globos įstaigoje gyvenančių vyresnio amžiaus asmenų gyvenimo kokybės veiksnys [Independence – a Factor of Quality of Life of Older People Living in Social Care Institutions]. Socialinis darbas. Patirtis ir metodai, 13(1), 113–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.7220/2029-5820.13.1.6
Pinker, S. (2020). Proto amžius. Mokslas, humanizmas ir pažanga mūsų laikais [The Age of Reason. Science, Humanism and Progress in Our Times]. Vilnius: Tyto alba.
Plath, D. (2008). Independence in old age: The route to social exclusion? British Journal of Social Work, 38(7), 1353–1369. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcm045
Plath, D. (2009). International policy perspectives on independence in old age. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 21(2), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420902733173
Rabiee, P. (2013). Exploring the relationships between choice and independence: Experiences of disabled and older people. British Journal of Social Work, 43(5), 872–888. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcs022
Rupšienė, L. (2007). Kokybinio tyrimo metodologija [Methodology of Qualitative Research]. Klaipėda: Klaipėdos universiteto leidykla.
Sherwin, S., & Winsby, M. (2011). A relational perspective on autonomy for older adults residing in nursing homes: A relational perspective on autonomy for older adults. Health Expectations, 14(2), 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00638.x
Stiehr, K., Eckert, J., & Garrison, P. (2016). Bericht Lebensqualität im Alter: Kriterien für eine zielgruppengerechte Verbraucherinformation [Report quality of life in old age: Criteria for target-group-specific consumer information]. ISIS GmbH – Sozialforschung, Sozialplanung, Politikberatung. https://isis-sozialforschung.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/BerichtLebensqualitaetImAlter235.pdf
Stiehr, K. (2020). European compendium on criteria for the quality of life of care home residents (Version V01.02). GAMLEC – Gaming for Mutual Learning in Elder Care. https://gamlec.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/GAMLEC_EU_Compendium_EN.pdf
Šinkūnienė, J. R. (2010). Socialinis darbas. Profesinė veikla, metodai, klientai [Social Work. Professional Activities, Methods, Clients]. Vilnius: Mykolo Romerio universitetas.
Tanner, D. (2005). Promoting the well-being of older people: Messages for social workers. Practice, 17(3), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/09503150500285156
GAMLEC Consortium. (n.d.). GAMLEC – Gaming for Mutual Learning in Elder Care. Retrieved September 5, 2026, from https://gamlec.eu/
Večkienė, N. P., Budėjienė, A., Ražanauskaitė, V., Ramanauskienė, K. & Valiulis, A. (2013). Socialinis darbas senėjančioje visuomenėje: teoriniai ir praktiniai tarpdisciplininio bendradarbiavimo aspektai [Social Work in Ageing Society: Theoretical and Practical Aspects of interdisciplinary Collaboration]. Gerontologija, 14(3), 171–183.
Wada, M., Canham, S. L., Battersby, L., Sixsmith, J., Woolrych, R., Fang, M. L., & Sixsmith, A. (2020). Perceptions of home in long-term care settings: Before and after institutional relocation. Ageing and Society, 40(6), 1267–1290. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X18001721
World Health Organization. (2025, October 1). Ageing and health. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health
Zhang, Y. & Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Qualitative analysis of content. In. B. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science (pp. 308–319). London: Libraries Unlimited.
Žalimienė, L., Dunajevas, E. (2015). Socialinės paramos dilema – tarp autonomijos ir paternalizmo [A Dilemma of Social Work – between Autonomy and Paternalism]. Vilnius: Vilniaus universiteto leidykla.
Žydžiūnaitė, V. & Sabaliauskas, S. (2017). Kokybiniai tyrimai. Principai ir metodai [Qualitative Methods. Principles and Methods]. Vilnius: Vaga.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.