Abstract
In the Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian we find a presentation of a theory of the virtues of eloquence: purity of language (latinitas), clarity (perspicuitas), appropriateness (aptum) and ornament (ornatus). All of them were originated by earlier Greek philosophers Aristotle and Theophrastus. Later this theory was taken on and elaborated by Roman rhetoricians – Cicero and Quintilian. Aristotle in his Rhetoric explicitly identified three of the four virtues (clarity, appropriateness and correctness). Theophrastus created a theory of four virtues of eloquence (correctness, clarity, appropriateness and ornament). His system was adopted by most of others. Dionysius, however, developed the most complex system of virtues. He presented a theory of virtues, which were divided into necessary (purity of language, appropriateness, lucidity and brevity) and accessory ones. The accessory virtues were further subdivided into another three groups. Rhetorica ad Herennium offered a three fold system: elegantia (including both correctness and clarity), compositio (similar to appropriateness) and diginitas (similar to ornament). Basically, in almost all aspects being closer to Cicero (who continues the tradition of Theophrastus), Quintilian is more focused on his theory of eloquence. He discusses the virtues of eloquence very widely and deeply, step by step, drawing a number of examples and including the educational process of an orator. Above all, although the theory of four virtues of Quintilian has been influenced by Ciceron, to some extent in general it does not claim originality and plays a paramount role in modern rhetorics, stylistic and pedagogy.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Literatūra,
Содержание сборников научных трудов: Literatūra. Rusistica Vilnensis за 2005–2007 гг
,
Literatūra: Vol. 50 No. 2 (2008)
-
Mindaugas Kvietkauskas,
Žemininkai Literary Movement in Vilnius: Relationship with the Space of a Multinational City
,
Literatūra: Vol. 65 No. 1 (2023): Literatūra
-
Tomas Čenys,
The Evolution of the Concept of Prison in Viktor Pelevin’s Works
,
Literatūra: Vol. 65 No. 2 (2023): Literatūra
-
Regimantas Tamošaitis,
Lietuvių literatūros kanono horizontai ir peripetijos
,
Literatūra: Vol. 65 No. 1 (2023): Literatūra
-
Neringa Klišienė,
The Short Dramatic Form in the Works of Kostas Ostrauskas and Juozas Erlickas
,
Literatūra: Vol. 65 No. 1 (2023): Literatūra
-
Rūta Šlapkauskaitė,
Editorial Board and Table of Contents
,
Literatūra: Vol. 64 No. 4 (2022): Literatūra
-
Joanna Kotowska-Miziniak,
Orality in War Novels: Different Aspects of Swear Words in Henri Barbusse’s and Ahmadou Kourouma’s works
,
Literatūra: Vol. 65 No. 4 (2023): Literatūra
-
Rūta Šlapkauskaitė,
Editorial Board and Table of Contents
,
Literatūra: 2022: Literature / Appendix
-
Tatiana Pakhareva,
Nightingale Garden near the Sea: on the Question of Akhmatov’s Intertext in A. Blok’s poem Nightingale Garden
,
Literatūra: Vol. 65 No. 2 (2023): Literatūra
-
Skirmantas Knieža,
Ethnosymbolism as a Framework for Early Modern Literature Analysis: Theoretical Reflections on the Identity of the Political Community of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania
,
Literatūra: Vol. 65 No. 3 (2023): Literatūra