Abstract
The paper deals with the sociology of literature of Pierre Bourdieu, one of the most influential figures in contemporary sociology of art. Initially, Bourdieu intended to overcome dichotomy of formalistic and contextual approaches, to transcend both the subjectivism and objectivism and to situate culture within broader social context and power relations. The sociologist suggested a systematic approach to literary practise and elaborated a theory of fields, the key terms of which are field, habitus, economic, social, cultural and symbolic capital, struggles, stake, structural homology, positions, dispositions, domination, strategy etc. The specificity of the literary field is defined mostly by the concepts of relative autonomy and “reversed” economy. Bourdieu examines the social positions of individuals and institutions involved in making cultural products (writers, publishers, critics, readers etc.), the social conditions, circulation and consumption of literary works. In this conceptual framework, literary text gains a specific status as the independent object of analysis (even such literary features as genre, narrative devices, types of characters etc. have special social meaning and function), what distinguishes Bourdieu from many his predecessors. His practical researches bring together various methods and combine empirical analysis with a strong theoretical frame. Numerous contemporary projects of sociology of culture are based on Bourdieu’s ideas. Some issues, however, have been brought for discussion, especially the universality of the notions and the concept of autonomy. Bourdieu constructed a powerful, highly theoretically structured model for interpretation of literature. It integrates every element of culture and provides tools for revealing their complex dialectical relations. Bourdieu’s sociology of literature might be a beneficial mode of analysis for Lithuanian literary scholars.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Polina Poberezkina,
Portugal in the 18th–20th centuries Russian poetry
,
Literatūra: Vol. 65 No. 2 (2023): Literatūra
-
Rūta Šlapkauskaitė,
Editorial Board and Table of Contents
,
Literatūra: Vol. 64 No. 4 (2022): Literatūra
-
Joanna Kotowska-Miziniak,
Orality in War Novels: Different Aspects of Swear Words in Henri Barbusse’s and Ahmadou Kourouma’s works
,
Literatūra: Vol. 65 No. 4 (2023): Literatūra
-
Mindaugas Kvietkauskas,
Žemininkai Literary Movement in Vilnius: Relationship with the Space of a Multinational City
,
Literatūra: Vol. 65 No. 1 (2023): Literatūra
-
Regimantas Tamošaitis,
Lietuvių literatūros kanono horizontai ir peripetijos
,
Literatūra: Vol. 65 No. 1 (2023): Literatūra
-
Tomas Čenys,
The Evolution of the Concept of Prison in Viktor Pelevin’s Works
,
Literatūra: Vol. 65 No. 2 (2023): Literatūra
-
Rūta Šlapkauskaitė,
Editorial Board and Table of Contents
,
Literatūra: 2022: Literature / Appendix
-
Neringa Klišienė,
The Short Dramatic Form in the Works of Kostas Ostrauskas and Juozas Erlickas
,
Literatūra: Vol. 65 No. 1 (2023): Literatūra
-
Skirmantas Knieža,
Ethnosymbolism as a Framework for Early Modern Literature Analysis: Theoretical Reflections on the Identity of the Political Community of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania
,
Literatūra: Vol. 65 No. 3 (2023): Literatūra
-
Literatūra 2013 55 (1)
,
Literatūra: Vol. 55 No. 1 (2013): Lithuanian Literature