Abstract
In the Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian we find a presentation of a theory of the virtues of eloquence: purity of language (latinitas), clarity (perspicuitas), appropriateness (aptum) and ornament (ornatus). All of them were originated by earlier Greek philosophers Aristotle and Theophrastus. Later this theory was taken on and elaborated by Roman rhetoricians – Cicero and Quintilian. Aristotle in his Rhetoric explicitly identified three of the four virtues (clarity, appropriateness and correctness). Theophrastus created a theory of four virtues of eloquence (correctness, clarity, appropriateness and ornament). His system was adopted by most of others. Dionysius, however, developed the most complex system of virtues. He presented a theory of virtues, which were divided into necessary (purity of language, appropriateness, lucidity and brevity) and accessory ones. The accessory virtues were further subdivided into another three groups. Rhetorica ad Herennium offered a three fold system: elegantia (including both correctness and clarity), compositio (similar to appropriateness) and diginitas (similar to ornament). Basically, in almost all aspects being closer to Cicero (who continues the tradition of Theophrastus), Quintilian is more focused on his theory of eloquence. He discusses the virtues of eloquence very widely and deeply, step by step, drawing a number of examples and including the educational process of an orator. Above all, although the theory of four virtues of Quintilian has been influenced by Ciceron, to some extent in general it does not claim originality and plays a paramount role in modern rhetorics, stylistic and pedagogy.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Владислав Кривонос,
«Херсонский помещик»: другое пространство в Мертвых душах Гоголя
,
Literatūra: Vol. 57 No. 5 (2015): Special Issue
-
Tomas Сenys,
Intertextual analysis of Viktor Pelevin’s collection of novels Pineapple water for the Fair Lady
,
Literatūra: Vol. 61 No. 2 (2019): Russian Literature
-
Inga Bartkuvienė,
Werner Hamacher. Für Philologie
,
Literatūra: Vol. 61 No. 4 (2019): Literature
-
Edyta Sacharewicz,
The role of music in Ken Bugul’s novels
,
Literatūra: Vol. 61 No. 4 (2019): Literature
-
Rūta Šlapkauskaitė,
Out of the Closet, into the World: The Power of Puppets in Jessie Burton’s The Miniaturist
,
Literatūra: Vol. 61 No. 4 (2019): Literature
-
Rūta Šlapkauskaitė,
Postmodern Voices from Beyond: Negotiating with the Dead in Margaret Atwood’s The Penelopiad
,
Literatūra: Vol. 49 No. 5 (2007): Special Issue
-
Tadas Kundelis,
Vytautas Bikulčius,
A Play of Points Of View on Narration of the Novel Thérèse Desqueyroux of François Mauriac
,
Literatūra: Vol. 58 No. 4 (2016): World Literatures
-
Rita Tūtlytė,
Jurgis Savickis: Fin de siècle ir jugendo parodijos ar žaidimas literatūrine tradicija
,
Literatūra: Vol. 53 No. 1 (2011): Lithuanian Literature
-
Nida Gaidauskienė,
Sofija Kymantaitė-Čiurlionienė’s Efforts to Enhance Women's Value and Self-Esteem at the Beginning of the 20th Century
,
Literatūra: Vol. 60 No. 1 (2018): Literatūre
-
Violeta Katinienė,
Aesthetic of carnivalesque: Johannisnacht by Uwe Timm and Lietuvis Vilniuje by Herkus Kunčius
,
Literatūra: Vol. 61 No. 4 (2019): Literature