Abstract
In the Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian we find a presentation of a theory of the virtues of eloquence: purity of language (latinitas), clarity (perspicuitas), appropriateness (aptum) and ornament (ornatus). All of them were originated by earlier Greek philosophers Aristotle and Theophrastus. Later this theory was taken on and elaborated by Roman rhetoricians – Cicero and Quintilian. Aristotle in his Rhetoric explicitly identified three of the four virtues (clarity, appropriateness and correctness). Theophrastus created a theory of four virtues of eloquence (correctness, clarity, appropriateness and ornament). His system was adopted by most of others. Dionysius, however, developed the most complex system of virtues. He presented a theory of virtues, which were divided into necessary (purity of language, appropriateness, lucidity and brevity) and accessory ones. The accessory virtues were further subdivided into another three groups. Rhetorica ad Herennium offered a three fold system: elegantia (including both correctness and clarity), compositio (similar to appropriateness) and diginitas (similar to ornament). Basically, in almost all aspects being closer to Cicero (who continues the tradition of Theophrastus), Quintilian is more focused on his theory of eloquence. He discusses the virtues of eloquence very widely and deeply, step by step, drawing a number of examples and including the educational process of an orator. Above all, although the theory of four virtues of Quintilian has been influenced by Ciceron, to some extent in general it does not claim originality and plays a paramount role in modern rhetorics, stylistic and pedagogy.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Mindaugas Kvietkauskas,
The narrative of identity transformation: Vaižgantas’s novel Pragiedruliai and the 1918-1920 conflict over Vilnius
,
Literatūra: Vol. 48 No. 5 (2006): Special Issue
-
Vytautas Bikulčius,
Michel Houellebecq’s Submission – a novel of decadence
,
Literatūra: Vol. 61 No. 4 (2019): Literature
-
Dalia Čiočytė,
Žemaitė’s Feminism
,
Literatūra: Vol. 51 No. 1 (2009): Lithuanian Literature
-
Linara Bartkuvienė,
Home: The Sacred and the Profane in John McGahern’s Novel That They May Face the Rising Sun
,
Literatūra: Vol. 61 No. 4 (2019): Literature
-
Jurgita Žana Žana Raškevičiūtė,
The 1930s Generation without Women, or on the Image of a Woman’s Identity in the Press and Poetry of The Nikita Khrushchev Era
,
Literatūra: Vol. 60 No. 1 (2018): Literatūre
-
Tünde Szabó,
Transgression in Lyudmila Ulitskaya’s novel Jacob’s Ladder
,
Literatūra: Vol. 61 No. 2 (2019): Russian Literature
-
Vigmantas Butkus,
Artūras Šeškus,
“The forest of gods“ by Balys Sruoga as a (distinctive) anthropological study
,
Literatūra: Vol. 52 No. 1 (2010): Lithuanian Literature
-
Giedrė Kazlauskaitė,
Vėlyvoji Vinco Mykolaičio-Putino lyrika kaip būties išskaidrėjimas
,
Literatūra: Vol. 57 No. 1 (2015): Lithuanian Literature
-
Asta Gustaitienė,
Children’s Works by Gendrutis Morkūnas and His Grįžimo Istorija (Story of Return) From the Standpoint of the Theology of Literature
,
Literatūra: Vol. 59 No. 1 (2017): Literature
-
Viktorija Šeina,
Literary canon studies: methodological guidelines
,
Literatūra: Vol. 61 No. 1 (2019): Literature