The Rhetoric of Lithuanian MeToo Discourse
Articles
Eglė Gabrėnaitė
Vilnius University, Lithuania
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4904-0148
Monika Triaušytė
Vilnius University, Lithuania
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8590-4540
Published 2021-05-11
https://doi.org/10.15388/Im.2021.92.51
PDF
HTML

Keywords

metoo
rhetoric
provocative discourse

How to Cite

Gabrėnaitė E. and Triaušytė M. (2021) “The Rhetoric of Lithuanian MeToo Discourse”, Information & Media, 920, pp. 46-64. doi: 10.15388/Im.2021.92.51.

Abstract

The great spread of the phenomenon of MeToo, a global movement promoting the publicity of the facts of sexual harassment, has also received a response in Lithuania: anonymous stories in blogs have grown into a provocative discourse that has attracted a great deal of attention. The aim of the research presented in this article is to characterise the discourse of MeToo in terms of rhetorical expression that has not been discussed yet: to identify and elicit the dominant elements of rhetorical argumentation.

The empirical research was conducted using the method of rhetorical analysis that allows distinguishing and defining in rhetorical categories the models characteristic to rhetoric appeals. The method of rhetorical analysis combined with directed content analysis, as well as with critical discourse analysis. Following the methodology of provocative narrative research, it was analysed the material published at the time of maximum intensity and involvement in the discourse, such as testimonies, publications, interviews, and comments of women who have been subjected to sexual harassment.

The results of rhetorical discourse analysis allow us to discuss the culture of accusation in which the normalization of victim condemnation is prevalent, and logical reasoning gives way to prejudice-based emotional appeals.

PDF
HTML
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Please read the Copyright Notice in Journal Policy