Abstract
The paper deals with the sociology of literature of Pierre Bourdieu, one of the most influential figures in contemporary sociology of art. Initially, Bourdieu intended to overcome dichotomy of formalistic and contextual approaches, to transcend both the subjectivism and objectivism and to situate culture within broader social context and power relations. The sociologist suggested a systematic approach to literary practise and elaborated a theory of fields, the key terms of which are field, habitus, economic, social, cultural and symbolic capital, struggles, stake, structural homology, positions, dispositions, domination, strategy etc. The specificity of the literary field is defined mostly by the concepts of relative autonomy and “reversed” economy. Bourdieu examines the social positions of individuals and institutions involved in making cultural products (writers, publishers, critics, readers etc.), the social conditions, circulation and consumption of literary works. In this conceptual framework, literary text gains a specific status as the independent object of analysis (even such literary features as genre, narrative devices, types of characters etc. have special social meaning and function), what distinguishes Bourdieu from many his predecessors. His practical researches bring together various methods and combine empirical analysis with a strong theoretical frame. Numerous contemporary projects of sociology of culture are based on Bourdieu’s ideas. Some issues, however, have been brought for discussion, especially the universality of the notions and the concept of autonomy. Bourdieu constructed a powerful, highly theoretically structured model for interpretation of literature. It integrates every element of culture and provides tools for revealing their complex dialectical relations. Bourdieu’s sociology of literature might be a beneficial mode of analysis for Lithuanian literary scholars.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Inga Bartkuvienė,
Werner Hamacher. Für Philologie
,
Literatūra: Vol. 61 No. 4 (2019): Literature
-
Владислав Кривонос,
«Херсонский помещик»: другое пространство в Мертвых душах Гоголя
,
Literatūra: Vol. 57 No. 5 (2015): Special Issue
-
Tomas Сenys,
Intertextual analysis of Viktor Pelevin’s collection of novels Pineapple water for the Fair Lady
,
Literatūra: Vol. 61 No. 2 (2019): Russian Literature
-
Edyta Sacharewicz,
The role of music in Ken Bugul’s novels
,
Literatūra: Vol. 61 No. 4 (2019): Literature
-
Rūta Šlapkauskaitė,
Out of the Closet, into the World: The Power of Puppets in Jessie Burton’s The Miniaturist
,
Literatūra: Vol. 61 No. 4 (2019): Literature
-
Rūta Šlapkauskaitė,
Postmodern Voices from Beyond: Negotiating with the Dead in Margaret Atwood’s The Penelopiad
,
Literatūra: Vol. 49 No. 5 (2007): Special Issue
-
Tadas Kundelis,
Vytautas Bikulčius,
A Play of Points Of View on Narration of the Novel Thérèse Desqueyroux of François Mauriac
,
Literatūra: Vol. 58 No. 4 (2016): World Literatures
-
Rita Tūtlytė,
Jurgis Savickis: Fin de siècle ir jugendo parodijos ar žaidimas literatūrine tradicija
,
Literatūra: Vol. 53 No. 1 (2011): Lithuanian Literature
-
Violeta Katinienė,
Aesthetic of carnivalesque: Johannisnacht by Uwe Timm and Lietuvis Vilniuje by Herkus Kunčius
,
Literatūra: Vol. 61 No. 4 (2019): Literature
-
Nida Gaidauskienė,
Sofija Kymantaitė-Čiurlionienė’s Efforts to Enhance Women's Value and Self-Esteem at the Beginning of the 20th Century
,
Literatūra: Vol. 60 No. 1 (2018): Literatūre