Abstract
The paper deals with the sociology of literature of Pierre Bourdieu, one of the most influential figures in contemporary sociology of art. Initially, Bourdieu intended to overcome dichotomy of formalistic and contextual approaches, to transcend both the subjectivism and objectivism and to situate culture within broader social context and power relations. The sociologist suggested a systematic approach to literary practise and elaborated a theory of fields, the key terms of which are field, habitus, economic, social, cultural and symbolic capital, struggles, stake, structural homology, positions, dispositions, domination, strategy etc. The specificity of the literary field is defined mostly by the concepts of relative autonomy and “reversed” economy. Bourdieu examines the social positions of individuals and institutions involved in making cultural products (writers, publishers, critics, readers etc.), the social conditions, circulation and consumption of literary works. In this conceptual framework, literary text gains a specific status as the independent object of analysis (even such literary features as genre, narrative devices, types of characters etc. have special social meaning and function), what distinguishes Bourdieu from many his predecessors. His practical researches bring together various methods and combine empirical analysis with a strong theoretical frame. Numerous contemporary projects of sociology of culture are based on Bourdieu’s ideas. Some issues, however, have been brought for discussion, especially the universality of the notions and the concept of autonomy. Bourdieu constructed a powerful, highly theoretically structured model for interpretation of literature. It integrates every element of culture and provides tools for revealing their complex dialectical relations. Bourdieu’s sociology of literature might be a beneficial mode of analysis for Lithuanian literary scholars.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Mindaugas Kvietkauskas,
The narrative of identity transformation: Vaižgantas’s novel Pragiedruliai and the 1918-1920 conflict over Vilnius
,
Literatūra: Vol. 48 No. 5 (2006): Special Issue
-
Vytautas Bikulčius,
Michel Houellebecq’s Submission – a novel of decadence
,
Literatūra: Vol. 61 No. 4 (2019): Literature
-
Linara Bartkuvienė,
Home: The Sacred and the Profane in John McGahern’s Novel That They May Face the Rising Sun
,
Literatūra: Vol. 61 No. 4 (2019): Literature
-
Dalia Čiočytė,
Žemaitė’s Feminism
,
Literatūra: Vol. 51 No. 1 (2009): Lithuanian Literature
-
Jurgita Žana Žana Raškevičiūtė,
The 1930s Generation without Women, or on the Image of a Woman’s Identity in the Press and Poetry of The Nikita Khrushchev Era
,
Literatūra: Vol. 60 No. 1 (2018): Literatūre
-
Tünde Szabó,
Transgression in Lyudmila Ulitskaya’s novel Jacob’s Ladder
,
Literatūra: Vol. 61 No. 2 (2019): Russian Literature
-
Vigmantas Butkus,
Artūras Šeškus,
“The forest of gods“ by Balys Sruoga as a (distinctive) anthropological study
,
Literatūra: Vol. 52 No. 1 (2010): Lithuanian Literature
-
Giedrė Kazlauskaitė,
Vėlyvoji Vinco Mykolaičio-Putino lyrika kaip būties išskaidrėjimas
,
Literatūra: Vol. 57 No. 1 (2015): Lithuanian Literature
-
Asta Gustaitienė,
Children’s Works by Gendrutis Morkūnas and His Grįžimo Istorija (Story of Return) From the Standpoint of the Theology of Literature
,
Literatūra: Vol. 59 No. 1 (2017): Literature
-
Viktorija Šeina,
Literary canon studies: methodological guidelines
,
Literatūra: Vol. 61 No. 1 (2019): Literature