Abstract
The paper deals with the sociology of literature of Pierre Bourdieu, one of the most influential figures in contemporary sociology of art. Initially, Bourdieu intended to overcome dichotomy of formalistic and contextual approaches, to transcend both the subjectivism and objectivism and to situate culture within broader social context and power relations. The sociologist suggested a systematic approach to literary practise and elaborated a theory of fields, the key terms of which are field, habitus, economic, social, cultural and symbolic capital, struggles, stake, structural homology, positions, dispositions, domination, strategy etc. The specificity of the literary field is defined mostly by the concepts of relative autonomy and “reversed” economy. Bourdieu examines the social positions of individuals and institutions involved in making cultural products (writers, publishers, critics, readers etc.), the social conditions, circulation and consumption of literary works. In this conceptual framework, literary text gains a specific status as the independent object of analysis (even such literary features as genre, narrative devices, types of characters etc. have special social meaning and function), what distinguishes Bourdieu from many his predecessors. His practical researches bring together various methods and combine empirical analysis with a strong theoretical frame. Numerous contemporary projects of sociology of culture are based on Bourdieu’s ideas. Some issues, however, have been brought for discussion, especially the universality of the notions and the concept of autonomy. Bourdieu constructed a powerful, highly theoretically structured model for interpretation of literature. It integrates every element of culture and provides tools for revealing their complex dialectical relations. Bourdieu’s sociology of literature might be a beneficial mode of analysis for Lithuanian literary scholars.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Jovita Dikmonienė,
Who is the Real Addressee of Seneca’s Moral Letters to Lucilius?
,
Literatūra: Vol. 57 No. 3 (2015): the Classics
-
Milda Danytė,
Changes in identity in Alice Munro’s stories: a sociopsychological analysis
,
Literatūra: Vol. 56 No. 4 (2014): World Literatures
-
Jurgita Žana Žana Raškevičiūtė,
“It Has Been so Long Since I Last Wrote to You, yet I Have Been Writing This Letter for Such a Long Time…”: The Letters of Janina Degutytė to Teresė Ramanauskaitė Bukauskienė
,
Literatūra: Vol. 60 No. 1 (2018): Literatūre
-
Nijolė Vaičiulėnaitė-Kašelionienė,
Les formes de la nostalgie dans la poésie d’Oscar Milosz et d’Alfonsas Nyka-Niliūnas
,
Literatūra: Vol. 59 No. 4 (2017): World Literatures
-
Ramunė Bleizgienė,
A People’s Writer for Peasant Readers: The Early Reception of Žemaitė’s Writings (1895–1915)
,
Literatūra: Vol. 61 No. 1 (2019): Literature
-
Audinga Peluritytė-Tikuišienė,
Who and what is doing in Henrikas Radauskas poetry?
,
Literatūra: Vol. 52 No. 1 (2010): Lithuanian Literature
-
Olga Bartoshevich-Zhagel,
“No, I Will Not Hide from the Great Mess…”: Mandelstam and Akhmatova
,
Literatūra: Vol. 62 No. 2 (2020): Rusistica Vilnensis
-
Naglis Kardelis,
Some notes on the reception of Egypt in Herodotus’s Histories
,
Literatūra: Vol. 47 No. 3 (2005): the Classics
-
Johan Tralau,
Father, Womb, Blood: Apollo’s embryological theory, the ethics of revenge, and the supposed exclusion of women in Aischylos’ Eumenides
,
Literatūra: Vol. 61 No. 3 (2019): Studies of Ancient Culture and Its Reception
-
Dalia Čiočytė,
The Archetypical Metaphor of Life as Dream and Its Literary Interpretations
,
Literatūra: Vol. 50 No. 1 (2008): Lithuanian Literature