Abstract
In this article are analysed reasons of violence for women in the family: the influence of patriarchalism model, poverty, the view for woman in the contect of history, depresion, discord and conflicts between members of family. On the ground of G. D. Myers, J. Gilligan, P. L. Berger, A. M. Pavilionienė, K. Miškinis and other authors ideas, there are explained origin of violence for women, the whole of values, traditions, customs, habits and attitudes what have influence for inequality of sex. In the modern society the role of woman is very depreciated, because the women are sold to slavery, they are beat, killed.
The results of investigation proved, that women conflict and cross with their husbands, because they drink hard, humiliate wives, don’t agree for education of children, for poverty in their family. Husbands attach a little attention for their wives. They don’t like, that wives don’t take care for them. Women difficulty experience the violence, they feel strain and fear, hatred and humiliation.
Some women aren’t independent and confident, because they married with that man who harmed woman before wedding. Women complain to friends, neighbours, relatives about violence from husband, but only some women inform for police. The facts aren’t solved, because the women forgive for their violenctions, live with them and suffer.
The sociological investigations are the best ilustration of fact, that the women are depended on economy conditions in the family. This depending is connected with physical violence. In this article are explained prevention possibilities (the Women crisis centres, psichology services, ungovernment organizations). Its are explained some standpoints about punishments for thees, who beats and harms women. There are some ideas from Criminal Code of Lithuanian Republic and UNIFEM organization about the violence for women. The author of this article thinks, that the society has to know about problems in the families.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Sigita Kraniauskienė,
Biographical Approach: Two Theoretical-Methodological Strands
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: No. 3-4 (2000): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Karolis Jonutis,
The Operationalization of Ernesto Laclau’s Theory of Populism: Case of the Political Party “The Way of Courage”
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2018): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Irmina Matonytė,
Social Capital: From the Scientific Reseach Perspectives Towards the Empirical Observations. A Question of Good Governance
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 13 (2004): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Vygandas Vareikis,
The History of the Relationship Between Lithuanians and Jews in XIX Century. Social and Economic Aspects
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: No. 3-4 (2000): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Artūras Tereškinas,
Conflicted Hegemony: Women and Media in Lithuania and European Union
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 14 No. 3 (2004): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Aistė Balžekienė,
Audronė Telešienė,
Leonardas Rinkevičius,
Climate Change: Social Risk Perceptions and Mass Media Discourse Configurations in Lithuania
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 22 (2008): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Donata Petružytė,
Grounded Theory Methodology: Comparison of Glaserian and Straussian Versions
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 21 (2008): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Leonardas Rinkevičius,
Theory of Risk- and Double-Risk- Society and its Application to the Diagnosis of the Development of Lithuanian Society
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 10 (2002): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Algimantas Valantiejus,
The Concept of Social Structure
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 18 (2006): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Tom Driver,
Isaiah Berlin, Michel Foucault and the Politics of Neoliberal Freedom
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 40 No. 1 (2017): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas