Abstract
In this article are analysed reasons of violence for women in the family: the influence of patriarchalism model, poverty, the view for woman in the contect of history, depresion, discord and conflicts between members of family. On the ground of G. D. Myers, J. Gilligan, P. L. Berger, A. M. Pavilionienė, K. Miškinis and other authors ideas, there are explained origin of violence for women, the whole of values, traditions, customs, habits and attitudes what have influence for inequality of sex. In the modern society the role of woman is very depreciated, because the women are sold to slavery, they are beat, killed.
The results of investigation proved, that women conflict and cross with their husbands, because they drink hard, humiliate wives, don’t agree for education of children, for poverty in their family. Husbands attach a little attention for their wives. They don’t like, that wives don’t take care for them. Women difficulty experience the violence, they feel strain and fear, hatred and humiliation.
Some women aren’t independent and confident, because they married with that man who harmed woman before wedding. Women complain to friends, neighbours, relatives about violence from husband, but only some women inform for police. The facts aren’t solved, because the women forgive for their violenctions, live with them and suffer.
The sociological investigations are the best ilustration of fact, that the women are depended on economy conditions in the family. This depending is connected with physical violence. In this article are explained prevention possibilities (the Women crisis centres, psichology services, ungovernment organizations). Its are explained some standpoints about punishments for thees, who beats and harms women. There are some ideas from Criminal Code of Lithuanian Republic and UNIFEM organization about the violence for women. The author of this article thinks, that the society has to know about problems in the families.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Arūnas Poviliūnas,
Antanas Voznikaitis,
Lina Mačiulė,
Monika Juknienė,
Elena Sinkevičiūtė,
Rima Žilinskaitė,
On the Attempt to Unlock the Black Boxes of Science (2)
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2018): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Gintautas Sakalauskas,
Sentencing in Lithuania: Practice and Meaning
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 20 (2007): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Irena Šutinienė,
The Memories of Soviet Era in Contemporary Lithuania: Ambivalence or Nostalgia?
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 32 No. 1 (2013): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Eglė Havrdova,
Sociological Implications in Crime Prevention: Narrowing the Gap between Theory and Practice
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 14 (2004): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Jolanta Piliponytė,
Corruption: Theoretical Attempts to Define and Explain
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 14 (2004): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Ingrida Gečienė,
Social Network Analysis in Migration Studies
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 25 (2009): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Ainė Ramonaitė,
Who Is Nostalgic About the Soviet Past? The Impact of Economic Status, Social Networks and Ideological Beliefs on the Soviet – Anti-Soviet Cleavage in Lithuania
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 33 No. 2 (2013): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Jolanta Reingardienė,
Dillemas of Women’s Career and Family Roles
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 13 (2004): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Vaidutis Laurėnas,
Dilemmas of Civic Society in Lithuania
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 11 (2003): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Arūnas Acus,
The Formation of Marginal Groups (Sociological Studies of Prostitution)
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 8 No. 3-4 (2001): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas