Abstract
In this article are analysed reasons of violence for women in the family: the influence of patriarchalism model, poverty, the view for woman in the contect of history, depresion, discord and conflicts between members of family. On the ground of G. D. Myers, J. Gilligan, P. L. Berger, A. M. Pavilionienė, K. Miškinis and other authors ideas, there are explained origin of violence for women, the whole of values, traditions, customs, habits and attitudes what have influence for inequality of sex. In the modern society the role of woman is very depreciated, because the women are sold to slavery, they are beat, killed.
The results of investigation proved, that women conflict and cross with their husbands, because they drink hard, humiliate wives, don’t agree for education of children, for poverty in their family. Husbands attach a little attention for their wives. They don’t like, that wives don’t take care for them. Women difficulty experience the violence, they feel strain and fear, hatred and humiliation.
Some women aren’t independent and confident, because they married with that man who harmed woman before wedding. Women complain to friends, neighbours, relatives about violence from husband, but only some women inform for police. The facts aren’t solved, because the women forgive for their violenctions, live with them and suffer.
The sociological investigations are the best ilustration of fact, that the women are depended on economy conditions in the family. This depending is connected with physical violence. In this article are explained prevention possibilities (the Women crisis centres, psichology services, ungovernment organizations). Its are explained some standpoints about punishments for thees, who beats and harms women. There are some ideas from Criminal Code of Lithuanian Republic and UNIFEM organization about the violence for women. The author of this article thinks, that the society has to know about problems in the families.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Indrė Gajdosikienė,
Oscar Lewis’ Culture of Poverty: Critique and Further Development
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 13 (2004): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Milda Pivoriūtė,
Karolina Poškauskaitė,
When “Too Much and Too Slapdash” No Longer Satisfies: Existential Changes Brought by Altering the Speed of Life
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 45 No. 2 (2019): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Milda Pivoriūtė,
“There is a Time for Departure Even when There’s no Certain Place to Go”: the Twisting Path to Selfhood and Adulthood
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2020): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Arnas Zdanevičius,
Deviation and Social Control. The History and Theory of Sociology of Deviation
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: No. 3-4 (2000): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Marjorie Ablanido Maido,
The Filipino “Backer System” in the Maritime Industry: The Privileged Access to Seafaring Jobs
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2021): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Ingrida Gečienė,
The Notion of Power in the Theories of Bourdieu,
Foucault and Baudrillard
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 10 (2002): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Marytė Gustainienė,
Reasons of Violence for Women
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 15 (2005): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Herbert Blumer,
The Methodological Position of Symbolic Interactionism
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 2 No. 2 (1998): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Arūnas Acus,
Deviant Behaviour
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: No. 1-2 (2000): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Giedrė Baltrušaitytė,
Theorising Mental Disorder: A Sociological Approach
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 11 (2003): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas