Abstract
This article aims to reveal the role of political power in the construction of collective identity through the collective memory. Three aspects is seeking to “hook” in the theoretical level: the determined trends of globalised current time, the national state as a homogeneous “imagined” community and cultural heritage as a historical reality and factor of joining together communities. The analysis uncovers that globalization is a dualistic phenomena. The tendencies could be marked under living conditions today: the ontological anxiety of society, a collective identity crisis, the legal and actual threats to the sovereignty, which may retain the nation state. Nationalism, as the ideological force homogenizing state and society, is strongly actualizing and becomes a “headache” not only for communities but also for the political authorities, who can’t stay away from declaring liberal laissez-faire principle, but must choose one from David Brown’s proposed nationalism strategies of society’s consolidation: ethno-cultural, civic or multicultural. Cultural heritage expressing a symbolic link to the legacy of previous generations must now become not only culturally, but also political and economic resource to the communities and politicians to create the basis for the stability of society and the state. The role of cultural heritage in the international political economy, development of public image models and developing positive relationships with neighbors in the historical context is very relevant today. Reinterpretation of cultural heritage dissonances in academic and public discourses should help to reconstruct the historical oblivion and construct the new formulas of collective identity in the second millennium of Lithuania.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Miglė Lapėnaitė,
Motives for Women’s Participation in Military Conflicts: The Ukrainian Case
,
Politologija: Vol. 103 No. 3 (2021): Politologija
-
Sigita Trainauskienė,
ONE OF THE THREE: THE STATUS AND ROLE OF A SEIMAS’ SPEAKER
,
Politologija: Vol. 83 No. 3 (2016): Politologija
-
Inga Patkauskaitė-Tiuchtienė,
The Impact of Political Scandals on Trust in State Institutions: Lithuanian Case Analysis
,
Politologija: Vol. 98 No. 2 (2020): Politologija
-
Donatas Palavenis,
CONFLICT RESOLUTION IN AFGHANISTAN. DO THEORIES WORK IN PRACTICE?
,
Politologija: Vol. 87 No. 3 (2017): Politologija
-
NIJOLĖ KERŠYTĖ,
IDEOLOGY AND FICTION (“DIE HARD”)
,
Politologija: Vol. 69 No. 1 (2013): Specialusis numeris: „Politika ir medijos“
-
Lukas Pukelis,
Vilius Stančiauskas,
The Opportunities and Limitations of Using Artificial Neural Networks in Social Science Research
,
Politologija: Vol. 94 No. 2 (2019): Politologija
-
Giedrius Žvaliauskas,
The Topics of Politics and Energy Security in a Social Study of Europe
,
Politologija: Vol. 93 No. 1 (2019): Politologija
-
Rūta Žiliukaitė,
VOTING IN THE ELECTION AND CHARACTERISTICS OF VOTERS’ SOCIAL NETWORKS
,
Politologija: Vol. 73 No. 1 (2014): Politologija
-
Gerda Vaičiūnaitė,
Eugenijus Dunajevas,
Interorganizational Cooperation and Youth Policy: Case of Utena
,
Politologija: Vol. 94 No. 2 (2019): Politologija
-
ZENONAS NORKUS,
WHY INTERWAR LITHUANIA DID LOSE VILNIUS AND CONTEMPORARY LITHUANIA LAGS BEHIND ESTONIA?
,
Politologija: Vol. 70 No. 2 (2013): Politologija