A Comparative Study of Two Real Root Isolation Methods
Articles
A. G. Akritas
University of Thessaly, Greece
A. W. Strzebonski
Wolfram Research Inc., USA
Published 2005-10-25
https://doi.org/10.15388/NA.2005.10.4.15110
PDF

Keywords

root isolation
Vincent’s theorem
continued fractions method
bisection (or Collins-Akritas) method

How to Cite

Akritas, A.G. and Strzebonski, .A.W. (2005) “A Comparative Study of Two Real Root Isolation Methods”, Nonlinear Analysis: Modelling and Control, 10(4), pp. 297–304. doi:10.15388/NA.2005.10.4.15110.

Abstract

Recent progress in polynomial elimination has rendered the computation of the real roots of ill-conditioned polynomials of high degree (over 1000) with huge coefficients (several thousand digits) a critical operation in computer algebra.

To rise to the occasion, the only method-candidate that has been considered by various authors for modification and improvement has been the Collins-Akritas bisection method [1], which is a based on a variation of Vincent’s theorem [2].

The most recent example is the paper by Rouillier and Zimmermann [3], where the authors present “... a new algorithm, which is optimal in terms of memory usage and as fast as both Collins and Akritas’ algorithm and Krandick variant ...” [3]

In this paper we compare our own continued fractions method CF [4] (which is directly based on Vincent’s theorem) with the best bisection method REL described in [3]. Experimentation with the data presented in [3] showed that, with respect to time, our continued fractions method CF is by far superior to REL, whereas the two are about equal with respect to space.

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.