Decarbonization as a Business Risk: Theoretical Insights and Empirical Evidence from the Automotive Sector
Articles
Maurizio Pompella
University of Siena image/svg+xml
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1747-2832
Nicos Scordis
St. John’s University New York
Published 2026-06-01
https://doi.org/10.15388/Ekon.2026.105.2.4
PDF
HTML

Keywords

Decarbonization
Cost of Risk
Tame and Wild Risks
Mahalanobis Clustering
ESG-GHG Decoupling Index

How to Cite

Pompella, M. and Scordis, N. (2026) “Decarbonization as a Business Risk: Theoretical Insights and Empirical Evidence from the Automotive Sector”, Ekonomika, 105(2), pp. 63–83. doi:10.15388/Ekon.2026.105.2.4.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this paper is to explore the financial and strategic implications of decarbonization from a business risk perspective. Starting from risk theoryinsurance economics, and transition finance, we conceptualize decarbonization not as a linear optimization process, but as a wicked problem. We argue that firms face both tame and wild risks, and that transition risk occupies a hybrid position that challenges conventional insurance as well as capital market arrangements.
MethodsTo empirically assess whether these theoretical dynamics are explicit in corporate behavior, we focus on the automotive industry, which is most exposed to decarbonization pressures. By using ESG data (14 profile scores) and GHG emissions (Scope 1, 2, 3 – absolute and intensity-adjusted), we analyse eight global multinational companies from the automotive sector, from 2017 to 2023. We build a novel ESG-GHG Decoupling Index (DI), capturing the divergence between sustainability disclosure and emission performance.
ResultsOur findings highlight significant misalignments in some firms, suggesting reputational risk, strategic inconsistency, or greenwashing. We complement this with a Mahalanobis distance-based clustering, revealing instead patterns of convergence and divergence in emissions strategy.
ConclusionsWe conclude that ESG improvements alone are not sufficient indicators of true environmental transition, and argue for a multidimensional, risk-based framework to assess corporate decarbonization efforts.

PDF
HTML

References

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)