What’s Wrong with Being Global: Perception of Healthiness of Global Food Products
Articles
Paulius Neciunskas
ISM University of Management and Economics
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1469-4758
Published 2022-06-21
https://doi.org/10.15388/omee.2022.13.70
PDF
HTML

Keywords

global products
local products
healthiness bias
disease avoidance

How to Cite

Neciunskas, P. (2022) “What’s Wrong with Being Global: Perception of Healthiness of Global Food Products”, Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, 13(1), pp. 50–70. doi:10.15388/omee.2022.13.70.

Abstract

This research demonstrates that global food products suffer from healthiness bias – a tendency to favor local food products and evaluate them as healthier than equivalent global or foreign food products. The paper extends previous research findings and provides empirical evidence that the perception of the product’s healthiness is a driver of this phenomenon. Results of three between-subject experimental research design studies indicate that global (versus local and foreign) food products are associated with lower perception of healthiness. In turn, such evaluations impact consumers’ buying intentions. Moreover, bias is more pronounced for consumers who perceive themselves as vulnerable to diseases and, conversely, disappears for those who are not vulnerable to diseases. The paper discusses the theoretical and managerial implications of these findings and points toward future research directions.

PDF
HTML

Most read articles by the same author(s)