Relationship Marketing Estimation Model in Emerging Economies: Dyadic Versus Non-dyadic Approach
Articles
Anton Agus Setyawan
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
Bernardinus M. Purwanto
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Basu Swastha Dharmmesta
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Sahid Susilo Nugroho
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Published 2019-12-31
https://doi.org/10.15388/omee.2019.10.9
PDF
HTML

Keywords

relationship marketing
dyadic approach
trust
commitment

How to Cite

SetyawanA. A., M. PurwantoB., DharmmestaB. S. and NugrohoS. S. (2019) “Relationship Marketing Estimation Model in Emerging Economies: Dyadic Versus Non-dyadic Approach”, Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, 10(2), pp. 174-195. doi: 10.15388/omee.2019.10.9.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze two estimation models related to relationship marketing in business-to-business interactions in the context of emerging economies. We compare two estimation models – one based on a dyadic approach and another based on a non-dyadic approach. We estimate these two models and compare their results to see which one is more suitable to be used as a theoretical relationship marketing model. We developed a survey comprising 204 dyadic observations of retailers and their suppliers and used a purposive sampling method. Three different observations correspond to three different estimation models. This study shows that the estimation model based on a dyadic approach has a better model fit than the model based on a non-dyadic approach regarding relationship marketing in a business-to-business context. The dyadic model also gives more accurate information to explain behaviour among companies involved in business relationships. Furthermore, this study explains how to examine estimation models in a relationship marketing context using dyadic and non- dyadic approaches. We also develop methods for examining dyadic perceptions of companies involved in business relationships. Our results contribute to the IMP school of thought in relationship marketing.

PDF
HTML
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Please read the Copyright Notice in Journal Policy.