Human Flourishing, Normativity and Critical Theory
Articles
Andrius Bielskis
Mykolas Romeris University; Kaunas University of Technology, Lithuania
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3560-5846
Published 2023-04-25
https://doi.org/10.15388/Problemos.2023.103.2
PDF
HTML

Keywords

Human Flourishing
Critical Theory
Normativity
Aristotle
Marx
MacIntyre
Kant

How to Cite

Bielskis, A. (2023) “Human Flourishing, Normativity and Critical Theory”, Problemos, 103, pp. 21–34. doi:10.15388/Problemos.2023.103.2.

Abstract

Aristotle has traditionally been aligned with conservative social and political philosophy. The conservative reception has been challenged by Alasdair MacIntyre and the Marx-inspired reading of Aristotle. Following MacIntyre’s arguments, this paper sketches an alternative conception of the critical theory beyond the Frankfurt School’s critique of the contemporary culture and the modern society. Critical theory is understood as an attempt to provide both historical analysis and normative critique of the contemporary society and its culture. It argues that normativity should be understood not in Kantian, but in Aristotelian terms. The articulation of Aristotelian conceptions of human flourishing and aretē, rather than that of the bürgerlich conception of Kantian duty, should be at the centre of contemporary theorising. The author claims that Aristotle’s practical philosophy allows us to conceptualise ethics beyond the dominant conceptions of ethical normativity prevalent in the capitalist modernity, while Marx is important because his analysis provides us with theoretical tools for the historically informed critique of the social and economic structures of the modern society.

PDF
HTML

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.